|
Transcendental Knowledge Systems, Power and Consciousness as Cruelty Padfield observes that the Hindu concept of caste duty and the imperative to act to better one's own Karma through disinterested service
Himmler's need to read the Bhagavad Gita to bolster his courage to watch atrocities, undismayed by sorrow, detached from any hint of sorrow or pity, in a disinterested manner, involves the use of a knowledge system, in this case a Hindu religious text that justifies the caste system, as a tool to generate emotional abstraction from the occurrence of atrocity. The knowledge system justifies the use of unconscionable power; it creates an irreality, indeed a kind of schitzophenic "doubling', in Robert J. Lifton's word, that separates the natural conscience of a man from his actions. Himmler's biography records that he couldn't kill a deer because of its beautiful eyes and he despised Goering and other top level Nazis who enjoyed hunting. He said that "nature is wonderfully beautiful and every creature has a right to live"- but yet he could order the murder of 11 million people.[2] This psychological doubling depends upon rationalizations, that is, it requires of system of knowledge and a socializing apparatus to justify it. That system was the Hindu system, as well as the Hitlerian vision of the German Reich. Christianity no doubt played a part also, with its glorification of suffering and death, which had been dear to the Germans for centuries and reflected in its art. Killing Jews, Indians or Africans was necessary for the glory of Christ and the civilization that loved him, revered him, offered him incense, prayer and their lives. The transcendental impulse in the Christian world view has an apocalyptic and transgressive element. It sees the world as a place of sin that is set on imminent destruction in recompense. The transgressive element in Christianity combines the most "sacred" and the most abhorrent: one is supposed to eat the flesh of the dead god to achieve transcendence. The crucifixion and apocalyptic imagery of Christianity teaches the necessity of cruel and violent redressal of sin in order that heavenly redemption might be achieved: sadistic, cannibalistic and transcendental luminous imagery are combined in disturbing and powerful images. The combination of being able to create fear of total apocalypse or damnation at the same time as an ultimate, nearly unrealizable hope is offered if one eats the flesh of the dead god is certainly one of the most powerful forms of mind control ever created. In any case it lead to the creation of an institution that all but ruled the western world for 1800 years. The Nazis admired this and used Catholicism as a model or organization, even if they did later renounce the Church. As Robert Westrich has observed:
Brought up a Catholic Himmler wrote in an early diary that he would "adhere to the Catholic Church even if I should be expelled from it."[4] This appears to be true despite his later renunciations. His concern with racial purity and the elimination of wrong thinking individuals resembles nothing so much as Torquemada and the Spanish Inquisition. The transference of the idea into Nazi ideology that Jews, homosexuals, socialists, gypsies and other outsiders, miscreants and "racially impure" persons must be sacrificed for the glory of the Reich, god, science or the state is certainly not a German invention, rather there is a long history to this racism. It has its origins in Christianity and European Civilizationism; the belief that only European civilization is legitimate. This Christian concern with apocalyptic punishment of outsiders and those conceived to be aberrant combined with the Hindu concern with caste and the view of human suffering as the result of Karma was a fatal combination that helped create the death camps, the Nazi doctors and the crematoria.[5] The idea of 'creative destruction' or Holy War or Holy Terror that is involved here is not merely a psychopathic adventure of which only Nazi's or psychopaths from Jack the Ripper to Jeffrey Daumer, the recently murdered killer of 17 boys, are capable. The case of Daumer indicates more that he was imitating the American mythology of power and not merely perverting it. He made a religion of consumption, eating some of his victims, just as the American cult of excessive consumption has cannibalized peoples. Daumer also saw his cannibalistic acts as a means to power and made an altar for his victim's skeletons that literalized the doctrine of transubstantiation. He spoke of wanting to sit and look at his victim's bones to enjoy the remembrance of his power over them. This resembles the drive for trophy collecting that the English and other European colonialists practiced, bringing home pieces of Africa, animal skins, elephant tusks, masks from Papua or collecting the art or the bones of Native Americans, dug up at archeological sites without permission of still existing tribes. Indeed, the cult of curiosities, travelling circuses parading Indians and animals, ceully treated, museum collecting or great expositions is not without relation to colonial exploitation, conquest and murder of both men and cultures. Daumer also saw himself as a kind of scientist. He collected and stored his victims like specimens, lovingly preserved. His father was a chemist who encouraged dissection. He said that he killed and devoured the boys because he loved them and wanted total power over them. [6] He ate parts of his victims not because he was hungry but because he wanted to possess and "own them" in the most intimate way possible. America visited a similar grotesque on the Vietnamese, whom they claimed to care for, wanted to liberate and possess. In the process the US killed four million of them.[7] The feeling of achieving transcendent power through murder or manipulation and coercion that such psychopathic serial murderers have described is clearly something that is also likely, perhaps more likely, to occur with large states, religions and institutions. With psychopathic cult leaders, such a David Koresh, Jim Jones and others there is no conscience concerning their actions. As Madeleine Tobias, basing herself on many comparative studies, has observed, "psychopaths see those around them as objects, targets or opportunities, not as people. They do not have friends, they have victims or accomplices".[8] The essential component of the psychopathic murderer is consciencelessness, the belief in themselves as the ultimate moral arbiter and thus their chosen end justifies any means. This is also true of many political states, whose level of abstract, nationalistic or corporate removal from consciousness of the actual effects of their actions tends to produce injustices and atrocities. [9] The "godlike rush of power over life and death" spoken of by one serial killer can also be seen acting through institutions.[10] The power over life and death is something Christ is supposed to have granted to the Catholic Church, for instance, and this was used to justify the Inquisition. [11]The level of abstraction achieved in a bureaucratic state from the consequences of action facilitates atrocities because the murders are committed by an abstract 'system' and the individuals in power can use this fact to hide their culpability: Murder becomes a duty to the state.[12] In our society, the fact of the US having the largest prison population in the world, extreme poverty in the ghettos and Reservations is excused on the grounds that freedom is wealth and that the miracle of the free market will 'trickle down'. Of course it never does. When 55,000 children were killed in Iraq in 4 days in 1991, American soldiers referred to the people they were killing as "cockroaches" and a military songbook used by American soldiers records the song "phantom flyers in the sky, Persian-pukes prepare to die, rolling in with snake and nape, Allah creates but we cremate". [13] Systems of knowledge/power appear to require atrocity to prove their power. The benefits that a state or religion want to accrue to "us" seems to require a "them" who must be eliminated. When there is no "them" that threatens, one has to be created. Once a state had committed an atrocity, it does not speak of it, as the U.S. covered up Hiroshima and Nagasaki for many years. It speaks only of its beneficence, it's manifest destiny or its exceptionalism. This ideology of "them versus us" is built into the structure of systems of knowledge and power, be these Nazi, Christian, Hindu, Capitalist or Marxist.
Previous Table of Contents Next [1] Padfield. pg.402 [2] pg.351 [3] Westrich, Robert Hitler's Apocalypse London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson 1985 pg.140 [4] Padfield. pg.45 [5] The complex roots of Nazism in various cults and occult groups from the Knights Templar to Jorg Lanz Von Liebenfels and the Neo-Aryan movements are discussed at some length in Nicholas Goodrick-Clark's The Occult Roots of Nazism. (New York, NY Press 1992) and Joscelyn Godwin's Arktos; The Polar Myth and Nazi Survival (Grand Rapids: Phanes Press 1992). which contains some interesting information on the origins of Ayranism. But Lifton's book on The Nazi Doctors explores more completely the mentality and psychology involved. The American and British roots of the Ayran myth are discussed in Reginald Horsman's Race and Manifest Destiny [6] "To Kill and Kill Again" This was a video production that was made for TV but based on the work of some Cal State researchers. I have been unable as yet to find the bibliographic reference or the producer's name. The Cal State study isolated a pattern among serial killers. It begins with 'predisposition' and 'dissociation': these are exaggerated by 'fantasy, and then 'violent fantasy', which are further exaggerated by 'facilitators'. The murderous actions take place as a result of these factors. The murder reinforces the emotions of the original trauma, which leads to further fantasy, and eventually more killing. This model explains alot. To create a model that would describe large scale atrocities is much more complicated. The ultimate motive, as in the case of Daumer, is power and control. But social and epistemological factors, such as institutional greed, the ideal of detachment, the ideological service to abstractions, complicate the process enormously. However, knowledge systems do act as 'facilitators' for entire societies, similar to the way alcohol or drugs act for the individual. Knowledge systems also act as 'fantasy', in the sense that fantasies orchestrate individual desires and impulses just as knowledge systems orchestrate social or collective impulses and desires. [7] The record of other serial killers statements confirms these observations. One, who killed little boys said "I did enjoy playing the jury, the judge, the prosecutor, and the executioner". interesting that this serial killer was imitating the cruelty of our justice system. Other serial killers mentioned enjoying the "idea of being able to make another human being do absolutely anything I wanted him to do" and also "the godlike rush of power over life and death". Power appears to be, in its ultimate form, power over "life and death". The paradox of knowledge/power arises from the consciousness of the powerful, who seek to legitimize their cruelty and power over life and death as a beneficial force. (quotes from "Murder by Numbers", aired on CNN May 13th 1996) [8] Tobias, Madeleine Captive Hearts, Captive Minds Alameda, Ca.: Hunter House 1994 pg.74 [9] His "grey eminence" Cardinal Richelieu, a defender of divine rights for the State and of monarchist absolutism said that "what is done for the state is done for God, [and] where the interests of the state are concerned, God absolves actions which, if privately committed, would be a crime". The facility, one might say the psychopathology, of this convenient evasion is interesting. The implicit claim to infallibility tends to govern states, and prohibits or at least mitigates their having to be responsible, as an individual is, for what is done. Power is its own justification, and the god concept is usually a projection of power interests. The amorality of power is reflected both in leaders of states and in gods, both of whom tend to claim infallibility and absoluteness, even if these qualities are hidden behind a democratic pose, as was the case with Reagan and Bush, for instance. (Richelieu quoted in Mckay, A History of World Societies, Houghton Mifflin. pg.611) [10][10] The sentence that is traditionally been used to justify the Catholic Church's power and authority follows from Christ telling Peter that he is the "rock" upon whom "I will build my church". "And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatsoever though shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth, shall be loosed in heaven". (Math. 16:18-19) In other words, the Church is the ultimate criteria of salvation and damnation, life and death, imprisonment and freedom. The 'spiritual claim' to control and authority over life and death evolves into the scientific claim of 'experts', sceintists and legal authorities over life and death. Life and deqth become forms of technolgy to be manipulated, rather than spiritual agencies acting invisibly behind the scenes of church involvement. [11] The power over life and death claimed by the church for centuries is a good example of the economy of benefits and deprivations that flow from systems of knowledge/power. But it must be observed that systems of knowledge power shift with changing times and influences, cultures and purposes. Another example of this, besides the one's given throughout this paper, is the Faust legend. The original purpose of the legend seems to have been to stigmatize the early movement towards science. The power and dogma of the church were threatened by the new knowledge that grew out of alchemy, Nominalism and other factors. By the time of Christopher Marlowe writing in Shakespeare's time, the Faust legend has taken on a romantic, thrilling appeal, almost as if it were better to sell ones soul for knowledge/power since beauty, conquest and world-knowledge result'. Damnation is almost worth the suffering. By the time of Goethe, Faust has become a positive figure, and Goethe even forgives Faust after Faust kills some old people who are in the way of scientific progress. By the time of Thomas Mann the Faust legend doubles back on itself, and the extremes of total knowledge through the Chruch or power and knowledge through science or intellect seems equally absurd, and Faust, while still a hero, is one who destroys himself in protest against the entire enterprise. After Mann the Faust legend is probably at a nihilistic and Nietszchean end, with the result that neither the Christian nor the scientific bid for knowledge/power are ultimately true or good-- they are testaments against themselves. What is left is the end of the myth and the beginning of the recognition that it was we who were undermining and destroying ourselves all along, and this could be mitigated somewhat if we gave up the myths and cared more for living, human rights and eachother than knowledge and power in its myriad mythical, religious and scientific forms. The Faust story fails because it was not about us, but about knowledge/power and the drive for knolwedge power both in the Church and in science has failed. What is left is fragi;e humanity and the drive for human rights. Faust is a dead myth. [12] The state has means to protect itself against individuals, but very few individuals are able to protect themselves against states or large corporate interests. This is why human rights protections must be independent of states or collective or corporate interests. The UN and the World Court were movements toward protection of human rights, but they have been ineffective because states, particularly the United States have ignored and sought to subvert them. [13] Stannard pg.253-54 The fiqure of 55,000 was determined by a ten member Harvard medical team (see Ibid pg. 337) |